论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析多巴胺与去甲肾上腺素治疗感染性休克的疗效。方法:选取我院在2015年3月至2016年3月期间收治的28例感染性休克患者作为研究对象,按照随机的原则将患者平均分成观察组和对照组,对照组患者采用多巴胺进行治疗,观察组患者采用去甲肾上腺素进行治疗,对比两组患者治疗的临床疗效。结果:采用去甲肾上腺素治疗的观察组患者整体效果显著优于对照组P<0.05,有统计学意义。结论:对于感染性休克患者,采用去甲肾上腺素进行治疗可以显著的提高治疗的效果,值得临床推广。
Objective: To compare the curative effect of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of septic shock. Methods: Seventy-eight septic shock patients admitted to our hospital from March 2015 to March 2016 were selected as the research objects. According to the randomized principle, the patients were equally divided into the observation group and the control group. The patients in the control group were treated with dopamine, Patients in the observation group were treated with norepinephrine, comparing the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results: The overall effect of the observation group treated with norepinephrine was significantly better than that of the control group (P <0.05), with statistical significance. Conclusion: In patients with septic shock, the use of norepinephrine for treatment can significantly improve the treatment effect, worthy of clinical promotion.