论文部分内容阅读
文章认为,周振甫的《中国修辞学史》和郑子瑜的《中国修辞学史稿》中有关仿拟的论述扩大了仿拟辞格的范围,模糊了仿拟格与摹仿、点化等现象间的界线。作者提出应从言语手段的角度切入,以言语形式的套用与否作为仿拟格认定的主要标准。
The article argues that Zhou Zhenfu’s “History of Chinese Rhetoric” and Zheng Ziyu’s “History of Chinese Rhetoric” have expanded the range of imitation figures and blurred the phenomena of imitation and imitation, The line. The author proposes that we should cut in from the perspective of speech means and use the verbal form as the main criterion for imitation.