论文部分内容阅读
■■兄: 来函收悉。感谢你的关怀。现将拙作《阵痛的时刻》公演后的争论情形,及我的思索告之,敬候指正。戏演出不久,便有两家报纸就戏结尾时慕容文华该不该离婚的问题展开了讨论。一种观点认为,慕容文华作为一个富有开拓精神的改革者,不仅在事业上,而且也应当在伦理道德观念上有所突破.否则性格便不够统一,因之,主张离婚。一种观点则认为,改革者并非完人,必然有其历史的、社会的局限性,在事业上有所突破的人并不一定在所有领域都有突破,因之,不离婚更为深刻。我认真地读了每一篇文章,深感这种争论是十分有益的。今天我们正处在一个伟大的变革时期,在这新旧观念交替的时刻,人们对于生
■ ■ brother: received the letter. Thank you for your care. I will now be “painful moment” after the controversial performance of the situation, and my thoughts to tell, respect and correct. Soon after the performance, two newspapers discussed the issue of whether Murong Wenhua should divorce at the end of the play. According to one view, as a pioneering reformer, Murong Wenhua not only made a breakthrough in his career but also in his ethical and moral concepts, otherwise his character would not be unified enough. Therefore, he advocated divorce. One view holds that the reformers are not perfect and will inevitably have their historical and social limitations. People who make breakthroughs in their careers do not necessarily have breakthroughs in all fields. Therefore, the non-divorce is even more profound. I have read every essay seriously and I feel it is very useful to have this argument. Today we are at a time of great change. At a time when the old and new ideas alternate,