论文部分内容阅读
【裁判要旨】赡养义务人因犯罪行为被判处无期徒刑并处没收财产不能免除其应负的赡养义务,赡养费的给付应优先于刑事财产刑的承担。同时,赡养义务人客观上不具备定期给付赡养费条件的,可采用一次性给付方式。□案号一审:(2013)中一法民一初字第1955号二审:(2014)中中法民一终字第509号【案情】上诉人(原审原告):吴春好。被上诉人(原审被告):黄海涛吴春好(1952年1月18日生)与黄海涛(1978年10月20日生)系母子关系。吴春好与前夫黄某生育了女儿黄海澜、儿子黄海涛。1976年吴春好与前夫黄某离婚,女儿黄海澜由前夫抚
[Purposes of the referee] When the obligor of maintenance is sentenced to life imprisonment for confiscation of crime and confiscated his property for the crime, he can not be exempt from the obligation of his maintenance. The payment of alimony shall take precedence over the criminal property penalty. In the meantime, if the obligor of maintenance does not have the objective of regularly paying alimony, the one-time payment may be adopted. □ Case No. First instance: (2013) Zhongyifa Minyi Chu Zi No. 1955 Second instance: (2014) Zhong Zhong Fa Min Yi Zhong Zi No. 509 【Case】 The appellant (former trial plaintiff): Wu Chunhao. The appellee (defendant in the first instance): Huang Haitao Wu Chunhao (born January 18, 1952) and Huang Haitao (October 20, 1978) are the mother-child relationship. Wu Chunhao and his ex-husband Hwang gave birth to daughter Huang Hailan, son Huang Haitao. In 1976 Wu Chunhao and her ex-husband Hwang divorce, daughter Huang Hailan ex-husband caress