论文部分内容阅读
目的比较LEEP刀手术和微波治疗中重度宫颈糜烂的疗效。方法将200例患者随机分为120例治疗组和80例对照组,比较两组的疗效等指标。结果治疗组的术后排液量、出血量、排液时间、出血时间均明显少于对照组(P<0.01);治疗组的治愈率为90.8%,明显优于对照组的68.8%(P<0.01)。结论 LEEP刀治疗中重度宫颈糜烂,具有手术时间短、出血量少、疼痛轻、恢复快、并发症少、治愈率高等优点。
Objective To compare LEEP knife surgery and microwave treatment of severe cervical erosion efficacy. Methods 200 patients were randomly divided into 120 cases of treatment group and 80 cases of control group. The curative effect and other indexes of the two groups were compared. Results The postoperative effusion volume, bleeding volume, drainage time and bleeding time in the treatment group were significantly less than those in the control group (P <0.01). The cure rate in the treatment group was 90.8%, significantly higher than that in the control group (68.8%, P <0.01). Conclusions LEEP knife treatment of moderate and severe cervical erosion, with shorter operation time, less bleeding, pain, rapid recovery, fewer complications, high cure rate.