论文部分内容阅读
新马克思主义城市学派指责马克思主义存在空间缺场,认为《资本论》的研究本质上是无空间的资本主义。通过对《资本论》及其手稿的文本考察可以发现这一论断是不符合事实的。马克思在《资本论》及其手稿中将时间和空间作为并列性因素纳入政治经济学分析的理论框架,他不仅将空间分析贯穿于资本分析的全过程,还通过“资本空间化”和“空间资本化”的双重逻辑揭示了资本与空间的辩证关系。厘清并还原《资本论》及其手稿的空间维度和空间视域对于我们准确把握历史唯物主义的科学内涵,坚守和捍卫马克思主义的指导地位具有重大的理论意义和现实意义。
The new Marxist urban school accused Marxism of the lack of space for space, that “capital” research is essentially spaceless capitalism. It is not true that this thesis can be found by examining the text of Capital and its manuscripts. In “Capital” and his manuscript, Marx takes the time and space as the theoretical framework of political economy analysis as the factor of parallelism. Not only does he carry out spatial analysis through the whole process of capital analysis, but also through “spatialization of capital” and The double logic of “space capitalization” reveals the dialectical relationship between capital and space. Clarifying and restoring the space dimension and the space horizon of “Capital” and its manuscripts have great theoretical and practical significance for us to accurately grasp the scientific connotation of historical materialism, to uphold and defend the guiding status of Marxism.