论文部分内容阅读
近二年来笔者为编纂《孙中山集外集》,广泛查阅了各种有关孙中山文献史料,其间有1986版《孙中山先生墨迹》(河北人民出版社)第34—36页载有孙中山给廖仲恺六封信,这是1924年平定商团事件的手迹。其中除1924年8月9日一函外,其余五函9月2日、9月3日、10月11日、10月22日、11月21日,笔者以为《孙中山全集》未收,拟编入《集外集》。后来发觉此六函手迹,却与孙中山致蒋介石六封信手迹内容和字体完全相同,不同的是日期有异,有二函日期与孙中山致蒋函却超前一个月时间,甚至有二函日期推迟一个月或二个月时间,将函中所述情况竞与当时历史事实严重脱节,不相符合,似有可疑。兹特举例于后,以与史学家商榷。
In the past two years, the author compiled “Sun Yat-sen Collection,” extensively consulted various historical documents about Sun Yat-sen, during which there was 1986 edition of “Sun Yat-sen Ink” (Hebei People’s Publishing House) Page 34-36 containing Sun Yat-sen to Liao Zhongkai Letter, this is 1924 Pingdingshang business event handwriting. In addition to a letter dated August 9, 1924, the remaining five letters on September 2, September 3, October 11, October 22, November 21, the author that “Sun Yat-sen Complete Works,” not to be proposed Into the “episode set.” Later found that the six handwriting, but with Sun Yat-sen Chiang Kai-shek letter to the six letters of the handwriting content and fonts are identical, except that the date is different, there are two letter date and Sun Yat-sen Jiang letter was a month ahead of schedule, and even delayed the date of two letters A month or two months, it seems suspicious that the situation described in the letter competes with the historical facts at that time in a serious and out-of-step manner. Let me give an example for later discussion with historians.