论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析输卵管结扎术和药物避孕的临床利弊。方法:选取2013年8月-2015年8月在我院行节育举措的496名女性,将其依据随机方式划分为输卵管结扎组(A组,119名)和口服避孕药组(B组,377名),A组行输卵管结扎术予以避孕,B组采用口服药物避孕。比较分析两组腰部不适率、经期延长率、月经不调率及妊娠率等指标。结果:A组在妊娠率、月经不调率及腰部不适率相比于B组,均低于后者且差异显著(P<0.05),A组在经期延长率相比于对照组,高于后者且差异较明显(P<0.05)。结论:针对育龄避孕女性,采用输卵管结扎术予以节育,除经期延长率外,在腰部不适率、经期延长率、月经不调率及妊娠率等指标方面均优于药物避孕,在临床中具有良好应用价值。
Objective: To compare and analyze the clinical advantages and disadvantages of tubal ligation and drug contraception. Methods: A total of 496 women who underwent gestation in our hospital from August 2013 to August 2015 were randomly divided into tubal ligation group (group A, 119) and oral contraceptive group (group B, 377 Name), A group of tubal ligation to contraception, B group using oral contraceptives. Comparative analysis of two groups of waist discomfort rate, menstrual extension rate, irregular menstruation and pregnancy rate and other indicators. Results: The pregnancy rate, irregular menstruation rate and waist discomfort rate in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P <0.05), while in group A, the rate of menstruation was higher than that in control group The latter and the difference is more obvious (P <0.05). Conclusion: For women of childbearing age, tubal ligation is used to make birth control. In addition to the prolongation rate of menstruation, the rate of lumbar discomfort, menstrual extension, irregular menstruation and pregnancy rate are better than those of drug contraception and have good clinical results Value.