论文部分内容阅读
在抗日战争时期的两次宪政运动中,自由知识分子对民主宪政简单化的教条性思维及对当时中国社会、政治形势恶化的焦虑感使得他们无暇冷静思考他们的主张和言行,激烈地要求政府在战争时期实行根本性的改革。而国民党却没有充分的理论资源来与之相抗,又为了维护其日趋枯竭的政治权威合法性,并获取美国的援助,不得不采取一种被动的姿态。但国民党这种拖延态度只能是激怒掌握话语权并为道德激情所鼓舞的自由知识分子,他们把国民政府看成了贪图权位、不愿为国为民着想的道德邪恶政权,导致两者间的对抗逐渐加剧,直至毫无理性对话,达成妥协的余地。
During the two constitutional movements during the War of Resistance Against Japan, the free intellectuals’ dogmatic thinking on the simplification of democratic constitutional government and the anxiety over the deterioration of the social and political situation in China at the time made them unable to calmly think their opinions and deeds calmly, demanding that the government In the war period to implement a fundamental reform. The Kuomintang, on the other hand, did not have sufficient theoretical resources to resist it. In order to safeguard its ever-depleting legitimacy of political authority and obtain U.S. aid, the Kuomintang had to adopt a passive attitude. However, the Kuomintang’s delaying attitude can only be a free intellectual who has angered those who hold the right to speak and are inspired by moral passion. They see the national government as a moral evil regime that has the authority to seek rights and is unwilling to serve the sake of the country and the people, resulting in both The confrontation between them gradually increased until there was no rational dialogue and room for compromise.