论文部分内容阅读
【目的】为科技期刊激励外审专家措施提供系统理论支撑。【方法】依据扎根理论的思想,选择16名科技期刊外审专家进行访谈,对访谈数据进行整理分析和对比,找到影响科技期刊外审专家审稿意愿的因素,进行归类和关系确定后,构建科技期刊外审专家审稿意愿模型。【结果】外审专家的审稿意愿受到效价性因素和成本性因素的双重影响,效价越高审稿意愿越强,而成本越高审稿意愿越低;效价性因素包括学术地位、学术水平、掌控感、启发思维、情感体验和社会贡献,而成本性因素包括时间成本和精力成本。【结论】科技期刊应提高掌控感、启发思维等审稿效价并降低审稿的时间和精力成本。
【Objective】 To provide systematic theoretical support for sci-tech periodicals to motivate foreign experts. 【Method】 Based on the theory of grounded theory, we selected 16 experts from outside science journals to conduct interviews, organize the analysis and comparison of interview data, and find out the factors that affect the reviewers’ willingness to peer review of science journals. After classification and relationship determination, Establishing a model of reviewing willingness of external reviewers of sci - tech periodicals. 【Results】 The willingness of peer reviewer was influenced by both the valence factor and the cost factor. The higher the valence was, the stronger the willingness to draft was, and the higher the cost was, the lower the willingness to peer review. The factors of valence performance included the academic status , Academic level, sense of control, inspirational thinking, emotional experience and social contribution, while cost factors include time cost and effort cost. 【Conclusion】 Sci-tech periodicals should improve the sense of control, inspire the reviewers such as thinking, and reduce the time and effort cost of reviewing.