论文部分内容阅读
在2009年证券民事维权领域,我们看到的是喜忧参半。喜的是,杭萧钢构案历时两年得以调解,受损投资者最终获得史无前例的82%高比例现金赔偿。忧的是,航天通信案中,法院认定《关于对航天通信2005年度会计信息质量检查结论和处理决定的通知》并非行政处罚,不具备规定的“前置程序”要求,投资人索赔无果而终。航天通信案暴露出虚假陈述证券民事赔偿“前置程序”的立法缺陷问题,这给司法实务造成了一系列问题,引起社会的广泛讨论。鉴于此,特推出“2009年十大证券法律事件”。
In the area of securities and civil rights protection in 2009, we have seen mixed results. The good news is that Hangzhou Hsiao Steel Structure conciliation lasted two years, the injured investors eventually get an unprecedented high proportion of 82% cash compensation. The concern is that in the case of space communications, the court found that the Notice on Conclusion and Handling of Accounting Information Quality Inspection for Aerospace Telecommunications in 2005 is not an administrative penalty and does not have the required pre-process requirements. The investor claims no The end result. The aerospace communications case exposed the flaws in the legislative compensation of false claims of securities civil compensation and prejudication, which caused a series of problems in judicial practice and caused extensive discussions in the community. In view of this, special launch “2009 top ten securities law incidents ”.