论文部分内容阅读
公益条款是立法者的公益理念在法律中的体现;但立法者在法律条文中所表达的公益概念是非常抽象的,这需要发挥司法活动的创造性与能动性,赋予法官较大的自由裁量权,由法官在具体个案中对公益条款进行具体的适用与解释.在具体的司法实践中,法官对公益条款的理解和裁量应当与立法目的相吻合,但是实际上存在很多偏差.因此,分析法官适用公益条款偏差的产生原因,探讨法官适用公益条款时应考虑的因素以及公益条款在司法活动中得以合理适用的对策,是十分必要的.
However, the concept of public welfare expressed by lawmakers in the legal provisions is very abstract, which requires the creativity and initiative of judicial activities to give judges a greater discretion, Judges in specific cases on the specific provisions of the public interest to apply and explain.In specific judicial practice, the judge’s understanding and determination of public interest provisions should be consistent with the legislative purpose, but in fact there are many deviations.Therefore, the analysis of judges It is necessary to find out the reasons for the deviation of public interest provisions, the factors that should be considered when judges apply public interest provisions, and the countermeasures that public interest provisions should be reasonably applied in judicial activities.