论文部分内容阅读
2010年颁布的《中华人民共和国侵权责任法》为数字图书馆侵权责任问题的解决提供了法律依据。该法第三十六条专条规定了数字图书馆侵权责任的归责原则。但该条规定还存在一些问题,如归责原则存在不足、间接侵权责任主观过错界定不明确、“通知”规定存在疏漏、责任形态规定不统一等。因此,对于《侵权责任法》第三十六条的规定要从分类细化归责原则的具体适用、明确界定间接侵权的主观要件、完善法条以弥补疏漏、统一规定侵权责任形态等几个方面进行修改和完善,以规制数字图书馆法律责任,推动数字图书馆事业的不断发展。
The Law of Torts of the People’s Republic of China promulgated in 2010 provides the legal basis for the solution of the liability of tort of digital libraries. Article 36 of the Act stipulates the principle of imputation of liability of tort of digital library. However, there are still some problems in the article, such as the principle of attribution is not sufficient, the definition of the subjective fault of indirect tort liability is not clear, there are omissions in the “Notice” and the rules of responsibility are not unified. Therefore, the provisions of Article 36 of the Tort Liability Act should be defined from the concrete application of the principle of categorization and delicacy, clearly defining the subjective elements of indirect infringement, perfecting the law to make up for omissions, and uniformly stipulating the forms of tort liability Aspects of the amendment and improvement in order to regulate the legal responsibility of digital libraries to promote the continuous development of the digital library.