论文部分内容阅读
我最近因为研究一家近代期刊的改版,涉及叙事体例的借鉴与创新,不免从我国古代史书体例中寻找认识性资源。在阅读唐代刘知几的《史通》、清代章学诚的《文史通义》以及近代历史学家关于历史编撰法的著作的过程中,我有一个强烈的感触:历史叙事与新闻叙事有一些共同的规律和规范。只是由于它们被现代学科体系切分成不同的学科和专业,以至于连“鸡犬之声”也不相闻
Recently, because I studied the revision of a modern periodical and involved the reference and innovation of the narrative style, I can not help but look for the cognition resources from the ancient history books in our country. In the process of reading Shi Zhitong of Liu Zhiji in the Tang Dynasty and the literary and historical literary meaning of Zhang Xuecheng in the Qing Dynasty and the writings of modern historians on the law of historical compilation, I have a strong feeling: historical narration and news narration have Some common rules and norms. Just because they are divided into different disciplines and professions by the modern academic system, so that even the “noisy”