论文部分内容阅读
目的了解肿瘤预防健康教育不同方法对肿瘤患者孙代近期干预效果。方法随机选取肿瘤患者孙代200名,随机分为实验组和对照组。实验组利用E-mail等现代化通讯手段和电子版材料对肿瘤患者孙代进行肿瘤预防健康教育,对照组则利用传统纸质材料。比较教育前后及两种教育方法的教育效果。结果 (1)实验组干预后的知晓率较干预前提高,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),除“H”和“I”知识点外,对照组干预后的知晓率较干预前提高,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),干预后的实验组对“肿瘤概念”外其他知识点的知晓率较对照组有所提高,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);(2)干预后,实验组和对照组孙代肿瘤预防态度均有所好转,干预后实验组各问题正确回答率稍高于对照组,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);(3)干预后实验组和对照组对不同种行为正确回答率均较干预前有所提高,但差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);干预后,实验组“良好饮食习惯”正确回答率高于对照组,其差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论肿瘤预防教育可提高肿瘤患者孙代对肿瘤预防知识的知晓率、态度和行为正确回答率,利用E-mail等现代化通讯手段和电子版材料教育方法的教育效果优于利用传统纸质材料教育方法。
Objective To understand the effect of different methods of cancer prevention and health education on the intervention of the grandchildren of cancer patients in the near future. Methods Totally 200 cancer patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group used modern means of communication such as E-mail and electronic version of the tumor prevention and health education for cancer patients’ grandchildren, while the control group used traditional paper materials. Compare the effect of education before and after education and two education methods. Results (1) The rate of awareness after intervention in experimental group was significantly higher than that before intervention (P <0.05). Except for knowledge points “” and “I (P <0.05). After the intervention, the experimental group’s awareness of other knowledge points outside the ”tumor concept“ was higher than that of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). (2) After the intervention, the preventive attitude toward tumor of the grandchildren in the experimental group and the control group all improved. After the intervention, the correct answer rate of each question in the experimental group was slightly higher than that in the control group (P> 0.05). (3) After the intervention, the correct answer rate of different kinds of behavior in experimental group and control group was higher than before intervention, but the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05); after the intervention, the experimental group ”good eating habits "The correct answer rate is higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Cancer prevention education can improve the awareness rate, attitudes and behavior correct rate of tumor prevention among grandchildren of cancer patients. The educational effect of using modern communication methods such as E-mail and electronic version of material education is better than that of using traditional paper material education method.