无痛人工流产的临床观察与分析

• 作 者: 徐峰
• 机 构: 河南省周口市人民医院妇产科,
• 出 处: 中国实用医药
• 发表日期: 2010年16期
• 关键词: 无痛人工流产术 药物流产 适应证选择

目的分析对比无痛人工流产与药物流产的疗效差异。方法对326例因早孕终止妊娠者采取无痛人工流产,同期随机对310例因早孕采取药物流产作对比。对术中疼痛、出血持续时间、出血量、完全流产率和并发症等方面的情况进行观察。结果无痛人工流产术的腹痛轻微,出血持续时间短,出血量少,完全流产率98%;而药物流产部分疼痛、出血持续时间长、出血量较大、完全流产率86.5%,两组疗效差异有显著性统计学意义(P<0.05)。但并发症无痛人流组相对多于药物流产组。结论无痛人工流产术疼痛程度轻,出血时间短完全流产率高,并发症相对就较多,临床应用时要加以选择。

Objective To compare the curative effects of painless induced abortion and medical abortion. Methods A total of 326 cases of abortion due to termination of pregnancy were taken painlessly. In the same period, 310 cases were randomized to take medical abortion because of early pregnancy. Intraoperative pain, bleeding duration, bleeding volume, complete abortion rate and complications were observed. Results painless abortion with mild abdominal pain, short duration of bleeding, less bleeding, complete abortion rate of 98%; and medical abortion part of the pain, the long duration of bleeding, bleeding, the complete abortion rate of 86.5%, two groups of curative effect The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). However, painless abortion group relatively more than medical abortion group. Conclusion Painless abortion with mild pain, short bleeding time, complete abortion rate, complications are more, to be selected in clinical application.