论文部分内容阅读
2009年12月26日通过的《侵权责任法》第22条第一次以法律形式明确规定精神损害赔偿,充分肯定精神损害赔偿制度在我国的价值,但对精神损害赔偿制度体系而言,违约责任中能否适用精神损害赔偿在法律上并没有得到明确,我国理论界和实务界,对于是否支持违约精神损害赔偿也可谓是众说纷纭。本文将从分析否定违约的精神损害赔偿制度的观点,以及正面分析在违约精神损害赔偿理论基础两面,论证确立违约精神损害赔偿制度的可能性以及必要性。
Article 22 of the Tort Liability Act passed on December 26, 2009 explicitly stipulates the compensation for mental damage in the form of law for the first time and fully affirms the value of the compensation system for mental damage in our country. However, for the system of compensation for mental damage, default The liability for the application of moral damages is not legally clear, our theoretical and practical circles, whether to support the spirit of compensation for damages can be described as divergent opinions. This article will analyze the possibility of the system of compensation for moral damage in negation of default and the necessity and necessity of justifying the system of compensation for moral damage in breach of contract from the perspective of analyzing the system of compensation for moral damage that negated the breach of contract and the positive analysis of the theoretical basis of damages for breach of contract.