论文部分内容阅读
为官一任,造福一方。除了数字造假者外,大多数官员追求CDP,并视之为自己在任时的政绩,不能算错;若有错,我看还得从“发展观”的误区上找找原因。论发展,就不得不睁眼看看存在着的“不平稳”:农业落后于工业,乡村落后于城市,西部落后于东部,传统行业落后于新兴行业,环境建设落后于经济建设。比如,2002年全国城镇居民人均可支配收入7703元,而农民的人均纯收入只有2476元,相差了两倍多:记得2000年全国“两会”前,各地见报的GDP,汇总后竟比国家统计局的数字多出了5800亿元!骗人的“政绩”该反对,但板子不能全打在“政绩观”者的屁股上。事实是,有什么样的“发展”标准,就会追求什么样的“政绩”。当进入了把“发展才是硬道理”变成了“GDP就是硬道理”之误区时,就不是简单的“政绩问题”了。谁能否认,正是在片面的“发展观”下,追求一时一地的经济增长才成了主政者共同的目标,盲目上项目、办企业、搞投资才成了时髦;发展必须以人为本的理念,却被某些官员不屑一顾。在这个“误区”里,以损害这一部分人的利益,而满足那一部分人的利益;损害长远利益,而满足
As an official, for the benefit of one party. In addition to the digital counterfeiters, most officials pursue the CDP as the performance of their own incumbents and can not be wrong; if they are wrong, I think they have to look for reasons from the misunderstanding of the “development concept.” On the development, we have to open our eyes and see the existence of “instability ”: agriculture lags behind industry, rural areas behind the city, the western laggard the east, the traditional industries behind the emerging industries, environmental construction lags behind economic construction. For example, in 2002, per capita disposable income of urban residents in the country was 7,703 yuan, while the per capita net income of peasants was only 2,476 yuan, a difference more than doubled: before 2000, the GDP of all parts of the country was reported before the “two sessions” National Bureau of Statistics more than the number of 580 billion yuan! Fraudulent “performance ” the opposition, but the board can not all play in “performance concept ” on the ass. The fact is, what kind of “development ” standard, will pursue what kind of “political achievements ”. It is not a simple “question of performance” when it comes to the misunderstanding that “development is the last word” and “GDP is the last word.” Who can deny that it is under the one-sided view of “development” that the pursuit of economic growth at a time has become the common goal of the government leaders. It has become fashionable to blindly engage in projects, run enterprises and engage in investment. Development must People-oriented philosophy, but some officials dismissed. In this “erroneous zone ”, in order to undermine the interests of some people to meet the interests of those people; damage long-term interests, and to meet