论文部分内容阅读
目的：探讨不同血源对中华按蚊种群生殖、存活、传疟的影响。方法：在实验条件下，用人血、牛血、猪 血、羊血分别饲养中华按蚊，观察记录中华按蚊吸血、产卵、孵化、寿命等方面的差异。结果：吸血量：吸猪血者最 低，与其他３种血源比较差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５），其余３者之间差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。吸血率：吸牛、猪血者 高，吸人、羊血者低；吸牛、猪血者与吸人、羊血者相比较差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）；吸牛、猪血者之间，吸人、羊血者 之间差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。产卵量：吸牛血者最高，吸猪血者最低，差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０１）。吸牛血者与吸 人、羊血者比较差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５）；吸人、羊血者比较差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。产卵率：吸猪血者低，但与吸 其他３者比较差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。孵化率：吸牛血者最高，与其他３者比较差异有显著性（Ｐ＜０．０５），而其余 ３者之间差异均无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。生殖营养周期：吸人血者最短，与吸牛、猪血者比较差异有显著性 （Ｐ＜０．０５），与吸羊血者之间差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５），吸牛、猪血者之间差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０５）。平均寿命：４种血源之间差异无显著性（Ｐ＞０．０?
Objective: To investigate the effects of different blood sources on reproduction, survival and malaria transmission in Anopheles sinensis populations. Methods: Anopheles sinensis was bred with human blood, bovine blood, pig blood and sheep blood respectively under the experimental conditions. The differences in blood-sucking, oviposition, hatching and longevity of Anopheles sinensis were observed and recorded. Results: The amount of sucking blood was the lowest among those who sucked pigs, which was significantly different from those of the other three sources (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the other three groups (P> 0.05). Blood-sucking rate: sucking cattle and pig blood were high, sucking human and sheep blood were low; sucking cattle and pig blood were compared with sucking and sheep blood, there was significant difference (P <0.05) There was no significant difference between the blood group, inhalation group and sheep blood group (P> 0.05). The fecundity was the highest in sucking cattle and the lowest in suckling pigs, the difference was significant (P <0.01). There was a significant difference between those who absorbed the calf blood and those who inhaled the blood and those who had the blood (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between those who inhaled the blood and the blood of the deceased (P> 0.05). The spawning rate was lower in sucking pig blood, but no significant difference compared with those in other three groups (P> 0.05). Incubation rate was the highest among those with bovine calculus, which was significantly different from the other three (P <0.05), while the other three had no significant difference (P> 0.05). Reproductive nutrition cycle: the shortest time for sucking blood, compared with sucking cattle and pig blood, there was significant difference (P <0.05), no significant difference between sucking blood and sucking blood (P> 0.05) There was no significant difference between cattle and pig blood (P> 0.05). Average life expectancy: no significant difference between the four blood sources (P> 0.0?