Clinical Study on Treatment of Shoulder Periarthritis with Electro-acupuncture on Point Jianyu (LI 1

来源 :针灸推拿医学(英文版) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:castchen
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较电针肩髃穴与口服双氯酚酸钠缓释剂治疗肩关节周围炎的疗效、安全性.方法:本实验为随机对照研究,患者随机分2组,每组30例,电针组采取电针患侧肩髑穴,每次针刺20 min.治疗每日1次.对照组口服双氯酚酸钠缓释片75 mg,每日1次.所有患者治疗7 d为1个疗程,连续治疗2个疗程,疗程结束后根据疗效评定标准进行疗效评估.结果:电针组和对照组有效率分别为93.3%和56.7%.结论:电针肩髑穴是治疗肩关节周围炎有效方法.对肩关节周围炎的疗效明显优于口服双氯酚酸钠缓释片.,Objective: To compare the curative efficacy and safety of electro-acupuncture on Jianyu (LI 15) with oral administration of Diclofenac Sodium Sustained-release Capsules in treating shoulder periarthritis. Method: Randomized controlled trials (RCT) were adopted in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups, 30 cases in one group.Electroacupuncture was done on Jianyu (LI 15) 20 min every time in the treatment group,while 75 mg Diclofenac Sodium Sustained-release Capsules were orally administered in the control group. For all the patients in two groups, one treatment course contains 7 days. Then the curative efficacy was evaluated by the efficacy evaluation criteria after two consecutive courses. Result: The total effective rate of treatment group and control group were 93.3% and 56.7% respectively. Conclusion: Electroacupuncture on Jianyu (LI 15) is an effective therapy for shoulder periarthritis and has more significant effect than oral Diclofenac Sodium Sustained-release Capsules.
其他文献
期刊
目的:观察梅花磁针综合疗法治疗良性前列腺增生症(BPH)的临床效果.方法:随机选择BPH患者219例,按随机原则分为:治疗组149例,采用穴位点压,梅花磁针和增效垫贴敷前列腺反射区,
目的 探讨经逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)、鼻胆管引流(ENBD)后腹腔镜胆囊切除胆总管切开取石后I期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管大结石的临床疗效.方法 回顾2015年6月至2016年6月55
HUANG Di-jun, was b in Guanghan city, Sichuan province in 1941. She is a professor and supervisor of doctoral candidate in School of Acupuncture and Massage, C
将86例海洛因依赖者随机分为电针合并美沙酮治疗组与单独使用美沙酮对照组进行疗效对照.治疗组与对照组二者的疗效(减分率)差异无统计意义(P>0.05).治疗组美沙酮的剂量为常规
通过总结推拿对小儿厌食症脾胃虚弱型的临床治疗,以及作者在临床治疗中的观察,起主要作用的手法有揉板门、摩腹、揉中脘、捏脊、揉足三里.,By summarizing and observing the
为观察针刺结合面瘫康复操治疗周围性面神经麻痹的治疗作用,采用针刺结合面瘫康复操治疗49例,并与单纯针刺治疗45例进行对照比较.前者总有效率为91.8%,后者总有效率为62.2%,
应用综合疗法治疗周围性面神经麻痹患者30例,并与电针浅刺治疗30例进行对照比较.两组治疗后,治疗组治疗痊愈率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),但有效率无明显差异.,Thirty cases of p