论文部分内容阅读
第三号和第四号蒙特利尔议定书是使华沙体制适应现代需要的最近的国际协议。1983年3月9日美国参议院拒绝表示同意批准这两项议定书。这一行动对由于美国的司法判决,特别是弗兰克林·敏特诉环球航空公司案的判决所引起的局面是火上加油,并且对由五十多年前生效的1929年华沙公约首次建立起来的世界性国际航空运输责任制度的效用造成严重威胁。如无美国(世界上最重要的国际航空承运人)参加这一世界性航空运输责任制度,那末华沙体制的作用就会(在很大程度上)受到削弱。本文从历史的观点来讨论一下美国参议院犹豫不决,不愿表示同意批准蒙特和尔议定书的理由,以便(一)了解美国退出华沙体制的含
The Montreal Protocol III and IV are the most recent international agreements that adapt the Warsaw system to modern needs. March 9, 1983 US Senate refuses to agree to ratify the two protocols. The move fueled the situation caused by the judgments of the United States, especially the Franklin Minter v. Universal Air Lines case, and for the first time in the world established by Warsaw convention of 1929, which came into force more than 50 years ago The utility of the sexual air transport liability regime poses a serious threat. Without the participation of the United States, the most important international air carrier in the world, in this worldwide air transport responsibility system, the role of the Warsaw Pact will be weakened (to a large extent). This article from a historical point of view to discuss the United States Senate hesitated to reluctant to agree to ratify the Monte-Seoul Protocol, the reasons for (a) understanding of the United States withdrawal from the Warsaw system containing