论文部分内容阅读
董其昌(1555—1636年)是晚明著名的书画家、鉴赏家和史论家,由于他本身的人品、画品和画学理论都存在着矛盾,历来人们对他见仁见智褒贬不一,使他成为中国绘画史上最难以正确理解和评价的一位争议性人物。清代康熙、乾隆时期当力其声誉隆盛的峰巅,如“四王”之一的王原祁曾称颂董其昌犹如韩愈“文起八代之衰”;而近现代他却成为各种批评指摘的对象,徐悲鸿甚至说董“才艺平平”,“吾尤恨董断送中国画二百余年,罪大恶极”;至极左思潮泛滥的年代,则因董氏的官僚地主身份,尤其是在松江一带流传的“民抄董宦”史实,更使得有关他的作品、理论
Dong Qichang (1555-1646), a famous calligrapher, connoisseur and historian of the late Ming dynasty, has always had conflicting views on his own personalities, paintings and painting theories. He became a controversial figure in the history of Chinese painting, the most difficult to correctly understand and evaluate. Wang Qiqi, one of the “Four Kings,” once praised Dong Qichang as if Han Yu “made the decline of the eighth generation” during the reign of the Kangxi and Qianlong periods of the Qing Dynasty. However, in modern times he became the object of criticism and criticism. Xu Beihong Even Dong said that “Talent is mediocre” and “I particularly hate Dong for giving Chinese paintings more than two hundred years with a tremendous amount of sin.” In the era when the extreme leftist trend spread, the identity of bureaucrats and landowners, especially the Songjiang area, Huan "historical facts, but also makes his work, theory