相对豁免论——保障私人与国家间的公平正义

来源 :法制博览(中旬刊) | 被引量 : 0次 | 上传用户:Huigle
下载到本地 , 更方便阅读
声明 : 本文档内容版权归属内容提供方 , 如果您对本文有版权争议 , 可与客服联系进行内容授权或下架
论文部分内容阅读
在国家豁免理论上,有绝对豁免论和限制豁免论两种学说,前者是认为只要是国家从事的行为都应理所当然的享有豁免而不论其行为的性质、目的为何;后者则认为只有国家从事的主权行为才能享有豁免,而商业行为则不能享有豁免。近年来,随着国际经济的发展,越来越多的国家开始采用限制豁免以保障私人利益。本文在说明限制豁免权的含义和理论依据的基础上,回顾了该理论的形成与发展,并总结了公约和国内法的有关规定,说明限制豁免论是大势所趋。 In the doctrine of state immunity, there are two theories: absolute immunity and limited immunity. The former holds that the purpose of immunity is granted as long as the acts carried out by the state are granted, irrespective of the nature of the act. The latter holds that only the state is engaged Of sovereignty in order to enjoy the exemption, while the commercial act can not enjoy the exemption. In recent years, with the development of the international economy, more and more countries have begun to apply restriction exemptions to protect their private interests. On the basis of the explanation of the meaning and theoretical basis of the limitation immunity, this article reviews the formation and development of the theory, and summarizes the relevant provisions of the Convention and the domestic law, which shows that restriction immunity is the trend of the times.
其他文献
风扇散热的原理是较冷空气流过芯片或PCB板时,通过热对流方法吸收芯片发出的热,变成较热的空气流出,从而达到驱散芯片间热空气的目的。当堆叠在一起的芯片之间有空气匀速流过,且
ue*M#’#dkB4##8#”专利申请号:00109“7公开号:1278062申请日:00.06.23公开日:00.12.27申请人地址:(100084川C京市海淀区清华园申请人:清华大学发明人:隋森芳文摘:本发明属于生物技
ue*M#’#dkB4##8#”专利申请号:00109“7公开号:1278062申请日:00.06.23公开日:00.12.27申请人地址:(100084川C京市海淀区清华园申请人:清华大学发明人:隋森芳文摘:本发明属于生物技
大数据和物联网作为21世纪两大热议话题,在货运中的应用不容忽视。引进大数据和物联网的概念不仅能改变供应链运作的方式,调整制造商和供应商、消费者之间的关系,两者的应用