论文部分内容阅读
汉斯-蒂斯·雷曼在《悲剧的未来?──论政治剧场与后戏剧剧场》~([1])一文中,列出两种对悲剧的解释。一种是亚里士多德以来至黑格尔的经典理论,这种理论将悲剧看作不同观念、伦理在具体人物的个别情致下的冲突,悲剧进程的结束将彰显冲突在精神实体中的辩证统一。另一种则认为悲剧是一种具有逾越性的体验。雷曼显然用第二种解释代替了第一种,试图对自古代以来的种种有悲剧性的剧场活动加以统合。“逾越”的看法,与现代以来的
Hans-Tiss Lehman lists two tragic interpretations in “The Future of the Tragedy - On the Theater of the Political Arts and the Theater of Post-Drama” [1]. One is the classic theory from Hegelian to Aristotle. This theory treats the tragedy as the conflict between different concepts and ethics under the individual sentiments of specific characters. The conclusion of the tragedy process will highlight the conflict in the spiritual entity Dialectical unity. The other is that tragedy is a transcendent experience. Lehman apparently replaced the first one with the second one, trying to unite the various tragic theatrical events since ancient times. “Passover ” view, with the modern since