论文部分内容阅读
笔者研究的中国物权法中的共同抵押,可能与一些学者的主张不同,笔者认为中国现行法中没有规定这一制度。~②因此,虽然已有不少教科书、论文等在谈论这个问题,但笔者认为这些都属于面向未来的理论构建而非现行法的解释。本报告也属于这一性质。那么,为什么说中国法中没有这一制度呢?笔者想先系统地介绍一下学者对共同抵押的认识。一、什么是共同抵押(一)1990年代的讨论(《担保法》制定前后)1.钱明星(1994)作为一个物权法中专有的概念,共同抵押是20世纪90年代初才在中
The author’s research on the co-mortgage in China’s Real Right Law may be different from the opinions of some scholars. I do not think that this system is stipulated in current Chinese law. Therefore, although many textbooks and dissertations are talking about this issue, the author believes that these belong to the theoretical construction of the future rather than the interpretation of the current law. This report is also of this nature. So why do we not say that there is no such system in Chinese law? I would like to give a brief introduction of scholars’ understanding of common mortgage first. First, what is a common mortgage (a) the discussion of the 1990s (before and after the development of the “Security Law”) Qian money star (1994) as a proprietary concept of property rights, co-mortgages were only in the early 1990s