论文部分内容阅读
法释2000[33]号第7条的规定,只有根据监督过失的原理才能得到合理的解释。监督过失学说肇始于日本判例,在我国交通肇事等案件的审理中事实上也被接纳。只有当监督人过失地造成被监督人过失地造成危害时,监督人才成立监督过失。监督义务的来源主要有法律规定的业务上分工产生的、先行行为产生的监督义务及对危险源控制产生的监督义务。我国常见的构成监督过失型的交通肇事罪的情况有:将车出借无证司机驾驶肇事型、聘请不具有合法资格司机驾驶肇事型及同意他人驾驶不合格车辆肇事型。
The provisions of Article 7 of the Legal Interpretation 2000 [33] can only be reasonably explained based on the principle of oversight of negligence. The theory of supervision of negligence started in Japan’s jurisprudence and was in fact accepted in the trial of traffic accident and other cases in our country. Only when the supervisor negligently causes the harm caused by the supervisor’s negligence will the supervisory talent be established to supervise the negligence. The sources of supervisory obligations are mainly the supervisory obligations arising from the division of labor according to the law and the supervisory obligations arising from prior acts and the supervisory obligations arising from the control of hazards. Common forms of supervision of the crime of negligence of traffic accident crime are: the car rental unlicensed driver driving the accident type, hired driver does not have the legal status of the driver and the consent of others to drive unqualified vehicle accident type.