论文部分内容阅读
本文在回顾语言测试领域构念效度理论和研究的基础上,采用定量和定性分析相结合的方法检验了某所高校所开发的校本英语分级考试的构念效度。研究结果表明,该校本英语分级考试的试卷内部结构一致性不太理想,试卷的构念主要表现为两个因子,与考试大纲规定考核的构念基本一致,但是考试的分数中仍存在构念表现不足现象。尽管大多数受试者对考试的整体效度持肯定态度,但是个别测试项目的效度却未得到多数受试的认可,而且问卷调查的结果也显示出他们对考核交际能力的需求。文章认为,考试构念的界定应综合考虑受试的实际语言需求和考试的可操作性,考试开发的过程中应该开展相应的效度研究,以确保考试结果的可靠性。
On the basis of reviewing the theory and research of the constructive validity of the language testing field, this paper uses the combination of quantitative and qualitative analysis to test the constructive validity of the school-based graduated English test developed in a university. The results show that the consistency of the internal structure of the paper is not ideal, the structure of the paper is mainly manifested as two factors, which are basically the same as those of the test syllabus, but there are still some conceptions in the test scores Under-performance phenomenon. Although most of the subjects were positive about the overall validity of the test, the validity of the individual test items was not recognized by most of the subjects, and the results of the questionnaire also showed their need to evaluate communicative competence. The article holds that the definition of the test concept should consider the actual language requirements of the test and the operability of the test. During the test development, corresponding validity studies should be carried out to ensure the reliability of the test results.