论文部分内容阅读
在方法论层面上,刑法要想有效发挥规整社会生活的功能,就必须确保规整方式与规整目的的契合性。就我国恐怖主义犯罪而言,立法对其抽象危险犯化、打击触角前移等体现出从严规制的目的及侧重对社会秩序的维护。但因立法者对恐怖主义犯罪采用的是将其纳入刑法典进行规整的方式,受刑法典自由保障精神的影响,上述目的已被消融掉了,从而显示出恐怖主义犯罪的规整方式与规整目的的错位与脱节,进而导致了立法从严与解释限缩之间的分歧。为了适应刑法立法观部分转向的现实需要,在恐怖主义犯罪的立法规制上有必要通过创制反恐特别刑法来承载这一转向,以确保该种犯罪的规整方式与规整目的的契合,实现立法与解释之间分歧的消除。
At the methodological level, in order to effectively exert the function of regulating social life, the criminal law must ensure the conformity of the regular way with the regular goal. As far as our country’s terrorist crimes are concerned, legislation exemplifies the purpose of strict regulation and the maintenance of social order by abstracting the dangerous crimes and cracking down the tentacles. However, the legislature has adopted the target of terrorist crimes in the criminal code to regulate the way it is bound by the freedom of the criminal code, the above purpose has been abolished, which shows that the regular way of terrorist crimes and regulatory purposes Dislocation and disjunction, which led to the legislative restrictions and the strict restrictions on the differences. In order to meet the practical needs of partial turning of the legislative concept of criminal law, it is necessary to carry out this transition through the creation of a special anti-terrorism criminal law to regulate the criminal legislation so as to ensure the conformity of such a criminal law to the regulation and realization of legislation and interpretation Elimination of differences between.