论文部分内容阅读
跨区域职业性噪声聋诊断、鉴定,对于诊断机构对职业病诊断申请材料的核实、诊断及鉴定过程中机构权限、职责范围、职业接触史认定,以及职业病赔偿责任认定等一些程序性和技术性问题,都需要更谨慎去把握。本文通过1例跨区域职业性噪声聋诊断、鉴定案例的讨论,结合职业病诊断和鉴定相关法规、规范要求,提出了一些在实际操作中存在的分歧和疑惑,希望卫生行政部门在修订相关政策或标准时能更清晰或明确,以利于基层职业病诊断与鉴定机构在实际操
Cross-regional occupational noise deaf diagnosis, identification, diagnostic agencies for the diagnosis of occupational disease application materials verification, diagnosis and identification of institutional authority, scope of responsibility, occupational exposure history identified, and occupational disease liability identification and some other procedural and technical issues, All need to be more cautious to grasp. This article through a case of cross-occupational noise deaf diagnosis and identification of cases, combined with occupational disease diagnosis and identification of relevant laws and regulations, norms and requirements, put forward some differences in practice and doubts, hoping to improve the health administrative departments in the relevant policies or Standards can be more clear or clear, in order to facilitate the diagnosis and identification of primary occupational diseases in practice