论文部分内容阅读
进入九十年代,中国人文和社会科学界掀起了学术史研究的热潮:文学、历史、哲学、政治、法律、经济等各个学科均从自己的视角出发,对近现代以来中国的学术道路、学术建树进行某种程度的总结,企望通过冷静反省鸦片战争以来尤其是新文化运动以来中国的文化命运和学术走势,来构成对中国学术和中国社会相互关系的深入理解,并在此基础上构筑对新世纪之新学术前景的展望。作为一门相对年轻的学科,中国的“新闻与传播学”在九十年代中国学术史研究的大合唱中显得有些底气不足,尤其在方法论上,表现出与其它人文一社会科学进行交流和国外同类研究展开对话的手段不多。造成这种结果的原因是多方面的,但解决问题的途径只有一个,就是增进了解。
In the 1990s, the humanities and social sciences in China set off a boom in the study of academic history. Various disciplines such as literature, history, philosophy, politics, law, economy and so on proceeded from their own perspectives and analyzed the academic paths and academic To a certain extent, to establish a summary of the extent to which we hope to build a deep understanding of the interrelationship between Chinese academics and Chinese society through a cool reflection on the cultural destiny and academic trend of China since the Opium War, especially the New Culture Movement, and based on this, Prospect of the New Academic Prospects in the New Century. As a relatively young subject, China’s “Journalism and Communication Studies” appeared somewhat inadequate in the chorus of the academic history of China in the 1990s. In methodology, in particular, it shows the exchange with other humanities and social sciences and the foreign similarities There are not many ways to study dialogue. The reasons for such a result are manifold, but there is only one way to solve the problem, which is to increase mutual understanding.