论文部分内容阅读
州法院能动主义——即称之为新的司法联邦主义——的最富争议的领域是使用州正当程序、平等保护和补偿权等条款以否决干预财产利益的经济条例。根据州宪法而授予对介人权利的保护较之美国最高法院根据联邦宪法而授予的保护更为广泛。这一动向业已普遍取得赞同,然而一旦涉及到经济权利,其反应就比较冷淡了。如果考虑到保障经济权利和“洛克纳”时代实体正当程序的关连,上述不冷不热的反
The most controversial area of state court activism, the so-called new federalism, is the use of state due process, equal protection, and the right to compensation to veto economic rules that interfere with the interests of property. The granting of protection of the rights to referrals under the state constitution is more extensive than the protection granted by the Supreme Court of the United States under the Federal Constitution. This trend has generally been endorsed, but its response has been rather muted once it comes to economic rights. If we consider the connection between the protection of economic rights and due process in the “Lockena” era,