论文部分内容阅读
在刑事主观方面事实证明中,口供是否需要补强不能一概而论。对于直接故意和疏忽大意过失的证明,口供不需要补强。对于目的犯中的目的、特定明知以及部分间接故意和过于自信过失的证明,庭审外供述原则上应当一律要求补强,当兼顾诉讼效率时,对轻罪案件可以不要求补强,但对重罪案件必须要求补强;庭审中供述由于真实性较强,不要求补强。对部分间接故意和过于自信过失的证明,需要运用其他证据和口供,共同证明主观方面事实。
Facts have proved in the subjective aspects of the criminal, oral confessions need to be reinforced can not be generalized. Confessions do not need to be supplemented by proof of direct negligence. For the purpose of purpose of guilty of the crime, the specific knowledge of the known and some of the indirect intentional and overconfident testimony, in principle, the outside court should be required to reinforce the statement, when taking into account the efficiency of litigation, the misdemeanor cases may not require reinforcement, but the felony The case must require reinforcement; court proceedings, due to strong authenticity, does not require reinforcement. Proof of part of the indirect intentional and overconfident negligence requires the use of other evidence and confessions to prove the subjective facts.