论文部分内容阅读
Vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) is an important biological reflex that controls eye movement to ensure clear vision while the head is in motion. Nowadays, VOR measurement is commonly done with a video head impulse test based on a velocity gain algorithm or a position gain algorithm, in which velocity gain is a VOR calculation on head and eye velocity, whereas position gain is calculated from head and eye position. The aim of this work is first to compare the two algorithms’ performance and to detect covert catch-up saccade, then to propose a stand-alone recommendation application for the patient’s diagnosis. In the first experiment, for ipsilesional and contralesional sides, the calculated position gain (0.94±0.17) is higher than velocity gain (0.84±0.19). Moreover, gain asymmetry of both lesion and intact sides using velocity gain is mostly higher than that from using position gain (four out of five subjects). Consequently, for subjects who have unilateral vestibular neuritis diagnosed from clinical symptoms and a vestibular function test, vestibular weakness is depicted by velocity gain much better than by position gain. Covert catch-up saccade and position gain then are used as inputs for recommendation applications.