论文部分内容阅读
拙作《组词要经得起实践检验──由“振聋发聩”提出的问题》发表一年，未起到“振聋发聩”的作用，却引来“不合时宜”的批评。批评者王灿龙先生大作《“振聋发聩”辨》（载《汉字文化》１９９７年第４期，以下简称《辨》）颇不尊重历史事实，我不能不辩，因作此文。“工具书
The book entitled “Mystic Works” can withstand the test of practice - the question raised by the “enlightened frivolous” was published for one year and failed to play the role of “deafening fury.” However, it has drawn “outdated” criticism. Critics of Mr. Wang Canlong masterpiece “” deafening fate “(containing” Chinese character culture “1997 the fourth period, hereinafter referred to as” discrimination “) does not respect the historical facts, I can not debate, because of this article. ”reference book