论文部分内容阅读
福州发生一家两名幼儿中毒死亡案件,邻居念斌因被认为是犯罪嫌疑人受到司法审判。8年里,他三次被一审法院认定犯有投放危险物质罪,判处死刑立即执行,第二次被二审法院维持原判,而最高人民法院不予核准死刑。最终,二审法院在今年8月22日宣判:撤销一审法院判决;念斌无罪并不承担民事赔偿责任。对这起落实疑罪从无原则的案件,可以从不同角度深入思考诸多问题,做出各种解读。但是念斌委托的律师在案件审理过程中的出色表现,使如何看待刑辩律师作用、司法者与刑辩律师应是何种关系的问题,成为绕
Fuzhou, a case of death of two young children poisoning, Nin Bin neighbor was considered as a suspect because of the judicial trial. In eight years, he was found guilty of putting on dangerous materials three times in the court of first instance, sentenced to death immediately and executed for the second time by the court of second instance, while the Supreme People’s Court did not grant the death penalty. In the end, the court of second instance sentenced on August 22 this year: the verdict of the court of first instance was rescinded; and bin innocent was not guilty of civil liability. From this perspective, we can think deeply about many problems from different angles and make various interpretations. However, the outstanding performance of the lawyers entrusted by Ninh Bin during the trial of the case makes the issue of how to view the role of criminal defense lawyers and the relationship between judicial and criminal defense lawyers.