论文部分内容阅读
作文批改是作文教学中的一个重要环节。长期以来,许多教育者和受教育者对这一概念认识狭隘、单一,甚至是错误。修改是剔出多余的纠正错误的,补充尚缺的,使习作趋于完善。但修改的主动者是谁?作为高高在上的人师认为自己是责无旁贷,作为学生认为那是教师的事情与己无关,自己只要把文章写出来,就完事大吉了。这种思想统治了作文教学几十年,甚至上百年。现代语文教学工作者在作文教学的实践中,深深体会到了其弊端,但却不敢越雷池一步,纵使有“冒险”者,也是浅尝辄止,后又归于沉寂。这种模式的作文批改无疑于阅读教学中的“灌输式”或“填鸭式”与目前新课标的以人为本的指导思想大相径庭,其不利之处在于:
Composition correction is an important part of composition teaching. For many years, many educators and educators have been narrow, single, and even wrong about this concept. The amendment is to remove the extra correction errors, supplement is still missing, so that the practice tends to improve. But who is the author of the revision? As a superior teacher thinks he is duty-bound, as a student that has nothing to do with the teacher, as long as the article itself, write it down. This idea ruled the composition of teaching decades, even hundreds of years. In the practice of writing teaching, modern Chinese teaching staff deeply understand its drawbacks, but do not dare to leap further. Even if there are “adventurous ” people, they also try their best and then return to silence. This model of essay correction is undoubtedly in reading teaching “Incontinence ” or “spoon-feeding ” and the current new curriculum standard of people-oriented guiding ideology is very different, the disadvantage is that: