论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比传统手术与微创手术治疗小儿疝的临床疗效。方法:选取就诊的132例小儿疝患者,按入院先后顺序分为观察组(微创手术)与对照组(传统手术)各66例,对比两组手术疗效。结果:观察组在手术时间、住院时间、术中出血量、自主活动时间及并发症发生率均优于对照组,指标间比较差异显著(P<0.05),具有统计学意义。结论:微创手术应用于小儿疝治疗效果好,可减少术中出血量、缩短手术操作时间,减少并发症的发生,属于该疾病的理想治疗方案,值得临床推广。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of traditional surgery and minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of pediatric hernia. Methods: A total of 132 pediatric hernia patients were selected and divided into observation group (minimally invasive surgery) and control group (66 cases) in each hospital according to the sequence of hospitalization, and the curative effect was compared between the two groups. Results: The observation group was superior to the control group in operation time, hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss, spontaneous activity time and complication rate. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The minimally invasive surgery is effective in treating pediatric hernia, which can reduce the intraoperative blood loss, shorten the operation time and reduce the complications. It is an ideal treatment for this disease and is worthy of clinical promotion.