论文部分内容阅读
在有关社会主义社会的商品、价值等問題的討論中,我們感到,有一个帶根本性的問題还未得到很好的解决。这就是社会主义社会必要劳动和价值的关系問題。有些同志在谈到社会主义社会必要劳动时,不仅把它同商品价值直接联系起来,并且經常把二者当作同一范疇,互相替用。有些同志虽然沒有把社会必要劳动和价值完全等同起来,但每每沿用分析資本主义經济的方式,从探討价值追索出社会必要劳动,而不是立足于社会必要劳动来探討社会主义社会的价值。我們觉得,这些見解很难說是妥当的。我們在另外几篇文章中曾經提出,必須把社会必要劳动这个普遍范嚋同价值这个特殊范疇区別开来。这一点,对于分析社会主义的經济过程,具有特别重要的意义。因为有了第一步:把社会必要劳动同它的特殊表現形式——价值区別开来,才可能有第二步:不限于价值这个特殊形式,直接从社会主义的社会必要劳动出发来探討社会主义的經济运动过程。
In the discussion on such issues as the commodity and value of the socialist society, we feel that there is a fundamental problem that has not yet been well resolved. This is the question of the relationship between the necessary labor and value in the socialist society. When talking about the necessary labor in socialism, some comrades not only link it directly with the value of commodities, but often use the two as a common category and substitute each other. Although some comrades did not completely equate socially necessary labor with value, they often used the method of analyzing capitalist economy to explore the value necessary to find out the necessary labor in society instead of basing themselves on the socially necessary labor to explore the value of socialism. We feel that these opinions can hardly be said to be proper. We have put forward in several other articles that the universal paradigm of socially necessary labor must be distinguished from the special category of value. This is of special significance for the analysis of the economic process of socialism. Because of the first step: to differentiate the socially necessary labor from its special form of expression - its value, there may be a second step: not only in the special form of value, but directly from the socially necessary labor in society to explore the social The process of economic movement.