论文部分内容阅读
目的比较抗生素序贯疗法和常规静脉滴注治疗小儿社区获得性肺炎的临床疗效和治疗成本。方法将126例小儿社区获得性肺炎患者随机分为观察组和对照组,患儿均给予抗生素治疗,观察组静脉用药3~5 d,患儿的临床症状及体征明显改善后改为口服同类抗生素;对照组持续静脉用药。结果观察组总有效率为82.5%,对照组总有效率为87.3%。两组住院时间及医疗费用比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论抗生素序贯疗法治疗小儿社区获得性肺炎有效、安全、经济,值得临床推广。
Objective To compare the clinical efficacy and cost of antibiotic sequential therapy and routine intravenous drip in the treatment of infantile community-acquired pneumonia. Methods A total of 126 pediatric patients with community-acquired pneumonia were randomly divided into observation group and control group. All patients were given antibiotics for 3 to 5 days. The clinical symptoms and signs of children in the observation group were significantly improved and changed to oral antibiotics The control group continued intravenous drug use. Results The total effective rate was 82.5% in the observation group and 87.3% in the control group. There was significant difference between the two groups in hospitalization time and medical expenses (P <0.05). Conclusion Sequential antibiotics treatment of children with community-acquired pneumonia is effective, safe and economical, worthy of clinical promotion.