论文部分内容阅读
西汉初年,毛亨为《诗经》作传注,世称《毛诗诂训传》,简称《毛传》,是我国流传至今的第一部系统地对《诗经》进行评注的著作。东汉末年,著名经学家郑玄(公元127—200)为《毛传》作笺释,世称《毛诗·郑笺》,或简称《郑笺》。在《毛传》和《郑笺》对《诗经》的评注中,保留了许多古词、古义和古代的文化、典章制度,是我们据以研究《诗经》、古代文化和训诂学的重要文献。郑玄为《毛传》作笺释的宗旨,据郑氏《六艺论》所说是“注《诗》宗毛为主,毛义若隐略,则更表明;如有不同,即下己意,使可识别。”看来到了东汉时代,有的人对《毛传》已不甚了解,故“义若隐略”,需要加以“表明”。此外,更为重要的是,郑氏对《毛传》的观点并非完全赞同和全盘接受,郑氏有自己的独到见解,所以他说“如有不同,即下己意。”
In the early years of the Western Han Dynasty, Mao Heng wrote a biography of The Book of Songs, and his name was Mao Shui Xun, referred to as Mao Chuan for the first time in our country, which is a commentary on the Book of Songs systematically. The late Eastern Han Dynasty, the famous scholar Zheng Xuan (AD 127-200) for the “Mao Biography” for the interpretation, known as “Mao Shi Zheng Jian”, or “Zheng Jian.” In Mao Zhuan and Zheng Jian’s commentary on The Book of Songs, it retains many ancient words, ancient righteousness and ancient culture and dictation system, which is the basis for us to study the Book of Songs, ancient culture and exegesis study literature. Zheng Xuan “Mao Biography” for the purpose of interpreting the purpose, according to Zheng’s “six arts theory” is “Note” poem “Zong Mao-based, Mao Yi if the covert, then shows; if different, that is, , So that it can be identified. ”It seems that in the Eastern Han Dynasty, some people did not quite understand“ Mao Chuan ”, so“ if it is not ”should be“ indicated. ” In addition, more importantly, Cheng’s view on Mao Chuan was not entirely approved and completely accepted. Zheng had his own unique opinions. Therefore, he said: “If there is any difference, then we will do so.”