论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察比较米非司酮与妇康片治疗更年期功能失调性子宫出血的疗效。方法:选取2009年1月—2011年1月我院收治的180例更年期功能失调性子宫出血患者,作为研究对象,按照入院顺序将其随机均分为两组,分别给予小剂量米非司酮和妇康片治疗,对比两组患者控制出血的时间和完全出血时间。结果:米非司酮组控制出血时间(19.45±5.69h)和完全止血时间(34.81±6.25h)均短于妇康片组(28.49±6.53h);(45.75±7.32h),比较差异均有统计学意义(p<0.05)。结论:妇康片和米非司酮治疗功能失调性子宫出血的作用机制不同,疗效也不同,米非司酮的止血效果优于妇康片,且安全有效,值得临床推广。
Objective: To observe and compare the efficacy of mifepristone and Fukang Tablet in the treatment of menopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Methods: One hundred and eighty menopausal dysfunctional uterine bleeding patients admitted to our hospital from January 2009 to January 2011 were selected as study subjects, randomly divided into two groups according to admission order, and were given low dose mifepristone And Fukang film treatment, control two groups of patients to control the bleeding time and complete bleeding time. Results: The control bleeding time (19.45 ± 5.69h) and complete hemostasis time (34.81 ± 6.25h) in the mifepristone group were both shorter than those in the Fukangpian group (28.49 ± 6.53h) (45.75 ± 7.32h) There was statistical significance (p <0.05). Conclusion: The mechanism of action of Fukang Tablet and Mifepristone in treating dysfunctional uterine bleeding is different. The curative effect is also different. Mifepristone has better hemostatic effect than that of Fukang Tablet, and is safe and effective, which is worthy of clinical promotion.