论文部分内容阅读
江南某市的移动、联通手机用户从2004年4月起,向所有手机用户收取来电显示费,标准为每月4元。公告期限一到,市内所有手机用户的话费单上都增加了4元的来电显示费。由免费到收费,许多用户不买账,龙先生和阚先生勇敢地走上法庭,向当地移动、联通两大移动通讯业巨头讨起了说法。此案在当地乃至全省掀起了波澜。移动、联通公司:按部委文件精神收费合法移动、联通公司的诉讼代表表示,公司按有关部委的文件调整资费标准,并按规定办理了相关的报批备案手续,收取来电显示费是合法的。原告人入网成为本公司的用户时,接受了本公司向其提供的移动电话免费来电显示服务,但双方没有就来电显示免费服务签订书面协议,对来电显示免费服务期限没有作任何约定。根据我国电信条例和相关的政策规定,电
Jiangnan City, a mobile city, China Unicom mobile phone users from April 2004 onwards, to all mobile phone users Caller ID charges, the standard is 4 yuan per month. As soon as the announcement deadline arrives, the caller ID fee of 4 yuan will be added to all telephone bills of the city. From free to charge, many users do not buy it, Mr. Long and Mr. Kan bravely went to court to move to the local, Unicom, the two largest mobile communications giant to argue. The case in the local and even the entire province set off a wave. Mobile, Unicom: According to the ministries and commissions, the legal fees and charges move, Unicom's lawsuit representative said the company according to the relevant ministries and commissions to adjust the tariff standards and regulations in accordance with the relevant filing procedures for filing, charging Caller ID fee is legitimate. Plaintiff entered the network as a user of the company, accepted the company to provide free mobile phone caller ID service, but the two sides did not sign the free service on the caller ID signed a written agreement, the caller ID free service without any agreement. According to China's telecommunications regulations and related policies and regulations, electricity