论文部分内容阅读
跨文化研究越来越成为历史学领域特别是史学理论研究领域的热点课题。认同问题与历史意识紧密结合,对文明的宏观研究可以从对历史意识的研究做起。在关于跨文化历史思维项目的讨论中,学者大多都能本着平等和相互尊重的态度开展积极的对话,能够认识到世界上的文化是多元的、平等的,坚持西方中心主义态度的学者已不多见。有关历史意识的讨论提供了一种类型学的研究方法,在确立了元概念之后,还进行了量化比较,提供了微观研究与宏观研究相结合的典型。当前世界文化的某些趋同现象的问题的核心是采取什么立场和以谁为中心。在文化传播中强调西方的主体和主动作用,就是西方中心论;强调吸取者主动学习西方,并根据自己的需要决定取舍,把他者的文化与自己的文化加以融合、改造,从而创造出一种既具西方色彩,又使传统文化焕发生机的新文化,就不是西方中心论。
Cross-cultural research is increasingly becoming a hot topic in the field of history, especially in the field of historical theory. The identity problem and the history consciousness are closely integrated, and the macroscopic research on civilization can start from the research on the history consciousness. In discussions on cross-cultural historical thinking projects, most scholars are able to engage in active dialogue based on equality and mutual respect. They can recognize that the cultures in the world are pluralistic and equal and that scholars who adhere to the attitude of Western-centered Rare. The discussion of historical awareness provides a typological approach to research. After the meta-concepts have been established, a quantitative comparison has been made, providing a combination of micro-studies and macro-studies. At the heart of the problem of some convergence of the current world culture is what position to take and who is the center. Emphasizing that the main and active role of the West in cultural communication is the Western theory of the center. Emphasizing that the learner takes the initiative to learn from the West and makes decisions according to his own needs, he integrates the culture of the other with his own culture to create a It is not Western-centered theory that a new culture of both Western and traditional Chinese culture should be revitalized.