论文部分内容阅读
我的发言题目为《两个沈奇与第三个沈奇》。沈奇的成与败,都和他的二重性有很大关系。首先,大家都关注到他既是诗人又是诗评家,这两者有一致的方面也有相互冲突的方面。在两个沈奇之间,诗人沈奇和诗评家沈奇之间,我选择诗人沈奇。我觉得诗跟他的本性更接近,他更属于一个诗人。诗评家沈奇非常努力,做了大量工作,他大我一轮多一点,但我的努力程度和花费时间以及勤奋程度都不敢和沈奇相比,这一点是值得
My speech is entitled “Two Shen Qi and the third Shen Qi.” Shen Qi’s success and failure, and his duality have a lot to do. First of all, everyone is concerned that he is both a poet and a poet. There are conflicting aspects in both of them. Between the two Shenqi, between the poet Shen Qi and the poet Shen Qi, I chose the poet Shen Qi. I think poetry is closer to his nature, and he belongs more to a poet. Shen Qi, a poet critic, worked very hard and did a great deal of work. He was a little more round-by-round but it was worth my effort and time and diligence to compare with Shen Qi