论文部分内容阅读
国防资产作为国防建设的物质基础,被《国防法》赋予保障其“安全、完整和有效”的国家理想。这一国家理想虽然附含有对现实生活的引领和范导之责,但一定程度上却构成对事实真相的超越。实践中,国防资产管理中多级委托代理体制的客观存在,使得不同主体极易形成对国家理想的认知偏差及实践异化。国防资产法律表达中的国家理想“求真”与“求善”目的的实现,迫切需要事实检验,以便与真相更加契合。
As the material basis for national defense building, defense assets are endorsed by the “National Defense Law” as a national ideal that guarantees their “safety, integrity and effectiveness.” This national ideal, although it contains the responsibility to guide and guide the real life, but to some extent constitutes a surpassing of the truth. In practice, the objective existence of multi-level principal-agent system in the defense assets management makes it easy for different subjects to form the cognitive deviation and practice alienation of the national ideal. The realization of the purpose of national ideal, “truth seeking” and “seeking good” in the legal expression of national defense assets urgently requires the examination of facts so as to be more in line with the truth.