论文部分内容阅读
陈元杰同志《“音乐质能统一场论假说”辨析》(见1988年第9期《人民音乐》,下简称《辨析》)对我《音乐质能统一场论假说》(见1987年第4期《人民音乐》,下简称《假说》)一文进行了批评。《辨析》一文除一句“理论上有突破之势”外。基本否定了我的观点。现即陈文所提问题进行答辩,进一步说明我的看法。一、《假说》基本思想的来源《假说》一文所提出的基本思想是将音乐视为一个“质能统一场”的本体论解释。这一思想的思考始自于我对“形式”与“内容”这一对重要
Comrade Chen Yuanjie, “” Discrimination of Hypothesis on Uniform Field Theory of Musical Quality “(see” People’s Music “, No. 9, 1988,” Discrimination Analysis “, short for” Hypothesis on Unified Field Theory of Musical Quality “(see No. 4 of 1987 ”People’s Music“, hereinafter referred to as ”Hypothesis“) was criticized. ”Discrimination“ a text in addition to a ”theory of a breakthrough trend“. Basically denied my point of view. Now Chen Wen’s question to reply, to further explain my point of view. I. THE SOURCE OF HOSPITAL’S BASIC THOUGHTS The basic idea put forward in the article ”Hypothesis“ is to regard music as an ontological explanation of a ”field of mass and energy unification.“ The thinking of this thought begins with my emphasis on the ”form“ and the ”content"