论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较两种胸腔积液引流方法的效果。方法:统计210例(A组)使用中心静脉导管引流胸腔积液患者的引流胸水量、胸水消失天数、胸水完全吸收率,并与182例(B组)使用传统抽液引流胸腔积液患者进行对比研究。结果:平均胸水量A组(4682±1235)mL,B组(2470±1040)mL;胸水消失天数:A组(6.5±2.6)d,B组(23.6±9.3)d;胸水完全吸收率:A组73.8%,B组25.8%,两组各指标均具有显著性差异(P<0.01)。结论:中心静脉导管引流胸腔积液较传统穿刺方法安全有效。
Objective: To compare the efficacy of two pleural effusion methods. Methods: 210 cases (group A) of patients with drainage of pleural effusion using central venous catheter were studied. The drainage volume of pleural effusion, the number of days of pleural effusion disappearing and the complete absorption rate of pleural effusion were compared with 182 patients (group B) with traditional drainage and drainage pleural effusion Comparative Study. Results: The mean pleural effusion volume in group A was (4682 ± 1235) mL, in group B (2470 ± 1040) mL. The number of pleural effusion disappearing days was 6.5 ± 2.6 days in group A and 23.6 ± 9.3 days in group B, respectively. 73.8% in group A and 25.8% in group B, with significant differences between the two groups (P <0.01). Conclusion: Central venous catheter drainage of pleural effusion than the traditional puncture method is safe and effective.