论文部分内容阅读
We investigated a developed arm roll forwarder at Nasu in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. An arm roll forwarder can only load a steel container that has been fully loaded with logs beforehand, and can later unload such a container. Such a forwarder can shorten the loading and unloading times and improve operational efficiency. We examined two operation systems with an arm roll forwarder and a forwarder. In the first system the loading was done with a grapple-loader. In the second system the loading was done with a processor. The loading times of an arm roll forwarder were significantly less than those of a forwarder. Because the optimal cycle times (excluding the waiting times for an arm roll forwarder) were significantly reduced, the costs of using an arm roll forwarder are lower, although the loading capacity was small and the hourly operation cost was high. The maximum operational efficiencies varied depending on forwarding distances. The second operation system with an arm roll forwarder exhibited the best operational efficiency within a 1,580-m forwarding distance, and beyond that distance it exhibited the highest operational efficiency when a forwarder was used. Similarly, the cost of operation of the system with an arm roll forwarder was the lowest within a 1,130-m forwarding distance, and beyond that distance the cost was the lowest when using the forwarder. Therefore, the arm roll forwarder is effective within a certain forwarding distance.
We investigated a developed arm roll forwarder at Nasu in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. An arm roll forwarder can only load a steel container that has been fully loaded with logs beforehand, and can later unload such a container. Such a forwarder can shorten the loading and un examined times and improve operational efficiency. We been two operation systems with an arm roll forwarder and a forwarder. In the first system the loading was done with a grapple-loader. In the second system the loading was done with a processor. The loading times for the optimal cycle times (excluding the waiting times for an arm roll forwarder) were significantly reduced, the costs of using an arm roll forwarder are lower, although the loading cycle was small and the hourly operation cost was high. The maximum operational efficiencies based on forwarding distance. The second operation system with an arm roll forwarde r exhibited the best operational efficiency within a 1,580-m forwarding distance, and beyond that distance it exhibited the highest operational efficiency when a forwarder was used. Similarly, the cost of operation of the system with an arm roll forwar was the lowest within a 1,130 -m forwarding distance, and beyond that distance the cost was the lowest when using the forwarder. Therefore, the arm roll forwarder is effective within a certain forwarding distance.