论文部分内容阅读
近年来,在生产资料生产优先增长规律的讨论中,对完全否定这个规律和只承认它是机器生产代替手工劳动时期的规律这两种意见,已有不少文章进行了商榷和质疑。本文拟从方法论中的一个方面,即运用科学抽象力的角度,探讨一下应该如何运用科学的抽象力去研究生产资料生产和消费资料生产增长的对比关系,同时兼论上述两种意见在方法论上的错误。在经济科学的研究范围内,作为逻辑起点的抽象规定,必须是最后的抽象,但又必须保持抽象的合理限度,这是辩证逻辑的基本要求。换言之,运
In recent years, in discussing the law of giving priority to the growth of the means of production, quite a few articles have been debated and questioned on the two opinions of completely negating this law and admitting it as the law of machine production instead of manual labor. This article intends to discuss how to use the abstraction of science to study the contrast between the production data production and the consumption data production growth from the aspect of methodology, that is, the use of scientific abstraction. mistake. Within the scope of economic science research, the abstract rules that serve as the starting point of logic must be the last abstract, but must maintain the reasonable and reasonable limit of abstraction. This is the basic requirement of dialectical logic. In other words, luck