论文部分内容阅读
刘先生是一名媒体从业人员,眼看报社分房无望,遍览京城各楼盘,选中一套房,可入住不久,原本规划图上绿茵茵的草坪上建起了4层小楼,他欲与物业说理,物业说不归自己管,想要联名打官司,又觉得麻烦,时间一长便不了了之。 刘先生的纠纷尚在萌芽状态,还没有进入“升级版”。但回想2001年,仅媒体曝光的物业纠纷所引发的打人事件就足以让消费者心有余悸。而这类矛盾在2002年依然在继续延伸。
Mr. Liu is a media practitioner, seeing the newspaper roomless hopelessness, all over the capital of the real estate, select a suite, you can stay soon, the original plan on the green lawn built a 4-storey small building, he wanted with the property Reason, the property that they do not belong to their own control, you want a joint lawsuit, but also feel trouble, a long time gone without. Mr. Liu’s dispute is still in its infancy, have not yet entered the “upgraded version.” But in retrospect, in 2001, consumer-facing incidents resulting from media-only property disputes alone were enough to keep consumers in a lingering fear. Such contradictions continued in 2002.